Synthires
Litigation Associate (Remote | $150–$300/hr)

How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
Litigation Associate
Position: Litigation Associate
Type: Contractor (Part-Time)
Compensation: $150–$300/hour
Location: Remote
About the Opportunity
micro1 is seeking accomplished Litigation Associates to contribute to a customer project at the intersection of litigation and legal AI. This opportunity is designed for experienced civil litigators with substantial federal court experience and a proven record of successful motion practice.
In this role, you will contribute your litigation expertise to workflows used to train and evaluate advanced AI systems. Your work will help improve how AI models analyze case law, construct legal arguments, evaluate litigation strategies, and draft persuasive motions with greater accuracy and legal judgment.
Responsibilities
- Perform simulated motion drafting, legal briefing, and litigation strategy exercises based on realistic federal civil litigation scenarios.
- Review and evaluate AI-generated responses to litigation problems for legal accuracy, reasoning quality, and practical usefulness.
- Provide detailed expert feedback to improve the precision and reliability of AI-generated litigation work.
- Develop objective evaluation frameworks, grading criteria, and rubrics for assessing AI performance on litigation-related tasks.
- Assess the quality of legal arguments, case analysis, procedural reasoning, and motion drafting.
- Identify errors, omissions, weaknesses, and inconsistencies in AI-generated litigation outputs.
- Translate practical courtroom and litigation experience into clear, actionable guidance for AI evaluation.
- Collaborate with product, research, and legal teams to refine datasets, guidelines, evaluation standards, and best practices.
- Apply strong legal judgment while maintaining consistency and objectivity across evaluation tasks.
Reasons to use Rodeo
I’m in my final year doing Economics and I don’t know whether to apply for grad schemes now or do a masters first. What do you think?
Honest answer — it depends on where you want to end up. A lot of top grad schemes (Big 4, civil service, banking) don’t need a masters. Let’s look at the ones you’d be competitive for now, and we can decide if a masters actually adds anything.
Also worth knowing: most autumn 2026 applications are open now. Timing matters more than you think.
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
Graduate Consultant — 2026 Scheme
Why you're a good match
StrongYour economics background and your summer at a regional bank line up with what PwC looks for on the consulting scheme. Applications close in four weeks.
See breakdownIt searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Why you're a good match
You’ve got the grades and the economics background, and your bank internship is exactly the experience this scheme looks for. Apply soon — deadlines close within the month.
Experience fit
Your summer at the bank plus your econometrics coursework map directly to the day-one responsibilities on this scheme — client modelling, market briefings, and deal support.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
Required Qualifications
- Substantial experience litigating civil matters in federal court.
- Strong experience with federal motion practice, legal briefing, and litigation strategy.
- A documented record of at least three successful motions in federal civil litigation, with supporting documentation such as court orders or docket entries.
- Strong knowledge of federal civil procedure and federal court practice.
- Exceptional written and verbal communication skills.
- Meticulous attention to legal detail and accuracy.
- Strong analytical and legal reasoning abilities.
- Ability to translate practical litigation expertise into clear, actionable feedback.
- Experience working effectively with cross-disciplinary teams in fast-paced environments.
- Interest in applying legal expertise to technology and AI-related workflows.
Preferred Qualifications
- Prior experience with AI, legal technology, legal research technology, or AI training/evaluation initiatives.
- Experience handling a broad range of federal motion types, including:
- Motions to dismiss
- Motions for summary judgment
- Discovery motions
- Other substantive or procedural federal motions
- Experience evaluating legal arguments, drafting strategies, or litigation work product.
- Familiarity with structured evaluation frameworks, legal quality review, or benchmark development.


Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
Key Areas of Expertise
- Federal Civil Litigation
- Federal Court Practice
- Civil Procedure
- Motion Drafting
- Legal Briefing
- Litigation Strategy
- Motion Practice
- Motions to Dismiss
- Summary Judgment
- Discovery Motions
- Case Law Analysis
- Legal Research
- Legal Argumentation
- Litigation Evaluation
- Legal Writing
- AI Output Evaluation
- Legal AI
- Evaluation Rubrics & Grading Criteria
- Legal Technology
- Analytical & Critical Reasoning
Compensation & Engagement
- Compensation is $150–$300/hour.
- This is a part-time contractor opportunity.
- Work involves litigation-focused AI training and evaluation activities.
- Experts will contribute their professional judgment to realistic legal scenarios and AI-generated work products.
- Engagement is conducted remotely with cross-disciplinary product and research teams.
Application Process
- Apply to the role and complete the required screening questions.
- Complete an AI Interview of approximately 30 minutes.
- Complete a Technical/Legal Assessment, if required.
- Participate in Hiring Manager Review.
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Location