Chessiverse AB
Dragon Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3......... 9.Nb3

How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
Dragon Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3......... 9.Nb3
Dragon Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 9.Nb3
_by International Master John Bartholomew
TL;DR
9.Nb3 anchors the queenside and prepares f4 to break open the position in the Classical Dragon. Less violent than the Yugoslav Attack but still demanding—this line is pure positional chess with concrete plans. The d5-outpost and c-file often decide the battle.
TL;DR Highlights
- White’s Plan: Nb3 → f4 (breaking open the queenside)
- Black’s Counterplay: Focus on queenside expansion and d5-outposts
- Key Squares: c5, g6, d5, e5
- Style: Strategic, less hyper-tactical than the Yugoslav
Main Line
- e4 c5
- Nf3 d6
- d4 cxd4
- Nxd4 Nf6
- Nc3 g6
- Be3 Bg7
- Be2 Nc6
- 0-0 0-0 9. Nb3
(ECO Code: B74 – Dragon Sicilian, Classical Setup)
**Summary |
- 82,666 games recorded on Lichess (one of the largest practical databases for this line).
- Key traits:
- Positional rather than tactics-heavy
- Heavy emphasis on queenside play and f4 plans
- Black must actively counter or equalise via ...a6 or ...Be6
History and Notable Players
As White |
- Praveen Mahadeo Thipsay (19 games)
- Vladimir Gurevich (16 games)
- Joan Fluvia Poyatos (14 games)
As Black |
- Ponnuswamy Konguvel (12 games)
- Alexander Khalifman (7 games)
- Bernardo Roselli Mailhe (7 games)
(A mix of versatile tactical players and positional strategists.)
Performance Across Rating Levels
| Elo Range | Games (% of total Raya) | White Win | Black Win | Draws | Sharpness (Win-Loss % Diff) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1200Elo | 0.00% (466 games) | 48.7% | 46.4% | 4.9% | Human-like, unbalanced positions |
| 1600Elo | 0.00% (6,300 games) | 51.2% | 44.0% | 4.8% | Patterns solidify |
| 2200+Elo | 0.01% (23,736 games) | 46.6% | 45.5% | 7.9% | Nearly 50-50; draws common |
| 2500Elo+ | 0.01% (1,725 games) | 45.4% | 46.4% | 8.2% | Black scores slightly better with preparation |
Reasons to use Rodeo
I’m in my final year doing Economics and I don’t know whether to apply for grad schemes now or do a masters first. What do you think?
Honest answer — it depends on where you want to end up. A lot of top grad schemes (Big 4, civil service, banking) don’t need a masters. Let’s look at the ones you’d be competitive for now, and we can decide if a masters actually adds anything.
Also worth knowing: most autumn 2026 applications are open now. Timing matters more than you think.
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
Graduate Consultant — 2026 Scheme
Why you're a good match
StrongYour economics background and your summer at a regional bank line up with what PwC looks for on the consulting scheme. Applications close in four weeks.
See breakdownIt searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Why you're a good match
You’ve got the grades and the economics background, and your bank internship is exactly the experience this scheme looks for. Apply soon — deadlines close within the month.
Experience fit
Your summer at the bank plus your econometrics coursework map directly to the day-one responsibilities on this scheme — client modelling, market briefings, and deal support.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
Key Trends
- At lower ratings (1200-1600), White holds a small edge but this vanishes at master levels.
- Draws increase dramatically at 2500+ (~8%+), showing no clear advantage to either side in deep theory.
- White’s early momentum fades with Black’s growing positional awareness.
Move Diversity and Theory Depth
At 1200 Elo (Beginner Amateurs)
- Most popular response from Black: a6 (26%) (Countering White’s kingside, threatening ...d5.)
- Only 4 deep theory moves probed (high entropy: 2.93).
- 67.8% adhere to theory—players stick to familiar patterns.
At 2500 Elo (Masters)
- Top move: B6 (49.7%), followed by a6 (19.4%) and a5 (16.4%). (B6 prepares ...d5 and reinforces the queenside.)
- Only 4 viable lines (theory adherence jumps to 85.5%).
- Lower entropy (2.05): Masters converge on a core set of must know lines.
Common Mistakes
❌ Neglecting Development
- Problem: Extra pawn moves (e.g., f5, f6 in defence)
- Fix: Always follow Nd2, e5 prep or b5 (queenside).
❌ Ignoring Kingside Attacks
- Problem: Letting h4-h5 or Kh2 retreats bigger risks without counterplay.
- Fix: Beans counter: b5/b6 and a6-a5, while spreading on the kingside too.
Key Ideas (Visual Flow after 9.Nb3)
For White:
✅ Outbridge to f4 (evaluates Black’s g6-safety) ✅ Defend e4 by Nb3 or Qd2 if Black presses with ...d5 ✅ Buffer kingside with f3 if Black counters on the queenside
For Black:
✅ Prepare ...d5 by reinforcing the c6-square ✅ Develop fast on B6 and O-O-O if White tries Yugoslav expansion ✅ Push kingside with h6 and Qh4 to counter Nb3-x4 traps
Practice Tips
For Black Players
- Test a6 vs the classics (Bartholomew’s verbose Bot Killed Me series).
- Try Be6 in training games—unlocks d5 or c4 tooling keys.
For White Players
- Smoother is 11.f3! before advancing on the queenside.
Data: Full Openings Explorer
Popularity & Win Rates by Rating
| Rating (Elo)* | Share | Games | w% | b% | d% | Sharpness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400 | 0.00% | 17 | 58.8% | 41.2% | 0% | 1.000 |
| 2500 | 0.01% | 1,725 | 45.4% | 46.4% | 8.2% | 0.918 |


Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
Most Know Moves at Black’s 9th Move
(Progression as rating increases.)
| El | Top 1st | 1% | 2% | 3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800 | x b6 | 31.7 | a6 | 27.9 |
| 2000 | b6 (precise positional lines) | 37.5% | a6 | 23.8 |
| 2200 | b6: 46.9% | a6: 17.5% | a5: 14.7% | |
| 2500 | b6 | 49.7% | a6: 19.4% | a5: 16.4% |
Time Control Popularity
| Format | Share (%) | Games Played | WhiteSharpEdge | DrawUp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blitz (74.0K games) | <0.01% | 74,054 | 48.8 | 45.1% |
| Rapid (8.6K games) | <0.01% | 8,612 | 49.3 | 42.9 |
| Bullet (40K games recommended) | <0.01% | 40,074 | 49.6 | 45.9 |
Reviewed By
IM John Bartholomew | Co-Founder & Chess Educator Co-founded Chessable and Chessiverse Notably: "Climbing the Rating Ladder" series, thousand-hours structured training courses.
Practice on Chessiverse
Try out the line! Play from 20+ move depths against ~1000+ AI bots with rated positions.
![Play Button] >> Try This Opening Now On Chessiverse <<
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Dragon Sicilian: 9.Nb3 theory-heavy?
- For experts: Highly theory-heavy. Deep Liners chore (ai-sense check).
- For lower levels: Use rotations (a6 vs b6) and avoid memorisation.
Why is this line superior to Yugoslav Attack?
- Yugoslav: Heavy reliance on kingside imbalances (pay-up for rapids/blitz).
- 9.Nb3: More queenside freedom and predictable long-term pressure.
Related Openings
| Subvariation | Tag | Type | Link (Play AI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerated Dragon | Nc7 > ...g6 | Unジアム | [Chessiverse Deepo] |
| Dragon Classical | 6.Be3 Qe7 7.Be2 1/e4 d6 Sharps! | Tactics | [Try Bot Here] |
| Yugoslav vs f通常 | f3 first (queenside-h5 overload) | KingSky | [Tactics Back] |
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Skills