Fengkai Group Co., Limited
PHD Peer Review – Biology
How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
PHD Peer Review – Biology
Peer Reviewer – Remote Part-Time Position
This is a long-term, stable part-time role supporting remote work.
Recruitment Guide
Please read the requirements carefully and fill out the application form accurately.
What You Need
- A Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced degree in a relevant subject area
- Published at least 5 papers in SCI / SSCI journals within the past three years
- A thorough understanding of:
- Research methodologies
- Ethical principles within your discipline
- Excellent analytical and critical thinking skills
- Strong written communication abilities, with the ability to provide:
- Clear
- Concise
- Constructive feedback
- Reliability in meeting deadlines and managing time effectively
- Commitment to maintaining confidentiality and objectivity
- Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals is highly desirable
- Familiarity with online manuscript submission and review systems
Reasons to use Rodeo
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
It searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
What You Will Do
-
Assess Novelty:
- Evaluate whether the manuscript is original and adds new knowledge or insights to the field of study
-
Evaluate Study Design and Methodology:
- Ensure study design and methods are:
- Appropriate
- Comprehensive
- Clearly described for reproducibility
- Ensure study design and methods are:
Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
-
Literature Review:
- Verify that the manuscript:
- Incorporates
- Cites relevant
- Up-to-date research in the field
- Verify that the manuscript:
-
Analyse Results and Conclusions:
- Determine if the results are presented:
- Clearly
- Appropriately
- Check if conclusions are:
- Supported by the data
- Significant to the field
- Determine if the results are presented:
-
Provide Constructive Feedback:
- Suggest improvements
- Highlight any flaws, omissions, or ethical concerns
-
Recommend Public Decision:
- Based on your evaluation, the journal editor will decide whether the manuscript should be:
- Accepted
- Revised
- Rejected
- Based on your evaluation, the journal editor will decide whether the manuscript should be:
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Skills
Location