Rodeo
ResourcesPartnersSign in

Fengkai Group Co., Limited

PHD Peer Review – Integrative & Complementary Medicine

United Kingdom
Posted 2 days ago
Sign up to applySee more jobs like this

How your CV stacks up

1Upload CV
2Analyse CV
3Improve CV

Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role

?%

PHD Peer Review – Integrative & Complementary Medicine

Here’s the properly formatted Markdown version of your job description:


🔍 Critical — Peer Reviewer (Part-Time, Remote)

A long-term, stable, part-time position supporting remote work is available. Please review recruitment requirements carefully and complete the application accurately.


Key Requirements

  • Qualifications:

    • Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent in the relevant subject area.
    • At least 5 published papers indexed in SCI/SSCI journals within the past three years.
  • Skills & Competencies:

    • Deep understanding of research methodologies and ethical principles in the discipline.
    • Strong analytical and critical thinking abilities.
    • Exceptional written communication with the capacity to provide clear, concise, and constructive feedback.
    • Ability to adhere to deadlines and manage time effectively.
    • Strict commitment to confidentiality and objectivity.

Reasons to use Rodeo

I’m in my final year doing Economics and I don’t know whether to apply for grad schemes now or do a masters first. What do you think?

Honest answer — it depends on where you want to end up. A lot of top grad schemes (Big 4, civil service, banking) don’t need a masters. Let’s look at the ones you’d be competitive for now, and we can decide if a masters actually adds anything.

Also worth knowing: most autumn 2026 applications are open now. Timing matters more than you think.

Start with a chat, not a search bar

Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.

P

Graduate Consultant — 2026 Scheme

PwC·London, UK
£35,000/yr

Why you're a good match

Strong

Your economics background and your summer at a regional bank line up with what PwC looks for on the consulting scheme. Applications close in four weeks.

See breakdown
Save jobNot relevant
View details

It searches the market for you

Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.

Why you're a good match

You’ve got the grades and the economics background, and your bank internship is exactly the experience this scheme looks for. Apply soon — deadlines close within the month.

See breakdown
Strong

Experience fit

Your summer at the bank plus your econometrics coursework map directly to the day-one responsibilities on this scheme — client modelling, market briefings, and deal support.

See breakdown
Strong

Only hits

No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.

  • Preferred Experience:
    • Prior peer reviewer experience for academic journals is highly valued.
    • Familiarity with online manuscript submission systems (e.g., ScholarOne, EasyChair).

Key Responsibilities

  • Novelty Evaluation: Assess whether the manuscript introduces original knowledge or new insights to the field.

  • Study Design & Methodology: Review whether the research design and methods are:

    • Appropriate for the study objectives.
    • Comprehensive and clearly described for reproducibility.

Get help with your application

Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.

Get help applying for this job
  • Literature Review Check: Verify that the manuscript thoroughly cites relevant, up-to-date research in the field.

  • Results & Conclusion Analysis: Critique whether:

    • Results are presented logically and transparently.
    • Conclusions are supported by data and significant to the research domain.
  • Provide Constructive Feedback: Suggest actionable improvements and raise red flags for:

    • Methodological flaws.
    • Ethical concerns.
    • Gaps or missing information.
  • Publication Recommendation: Collaborate with the journal editor to determine whether the manuscript should be:

    • Accepted as-is.
    • Require revisions.
    • Rejected.

Trusted by 25,000+ job seekers

“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”

Jessica, London

Get help applying for this job

Skills

Research Methodologies
Analytical Skills
Critical Thinking
Written Communication
Feedback
Confidentiality
Objectivity
Peer Review
Study Design
Methodology
Literature Review
Results Analysis
Constructive Feedback
Publication Recommendation

Location

United Kingdom

Sign up to applySee more jobs like this