Rodeo
ResourcesPartnersSign in

Fengkai Group Co., Limited

PHD Peer Review Need– Materials Science

United Kingdom
Posted 7 days ago
Sign up to applySee more jobs like this

How your CV stacks up

1Upload CV
2Analyse CV
3Improve CV

Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role

?%

Peer Reviewer (Academic Journal) – Long-Term Remote Role

This is a long-term, stable part-time position supporting remote work. Please review the requirements carefully before applying.


About the Role

This position involves independent peer review for scholarly manuscripts within an academic journal. You’ll provide key critical assessments to ensure high standards of research integrity, quality, and originality.


Requirements

Essential Qualifications

  • A Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced degree in the relevant subject area.
  • Published at least 5 peer-reviewed papers in SCI/SSCI journals within the last three years.
  • A thorough understanding of:
    • Research methodologies and their ethical principles.
    • Current standards in the academic field.
  • Excellent analytical and critical thinking skills.
  • Outstanding written communication, able to provide:
    • Clear, concise, and constructive feedback.
    • Detailed, objective critiques.
  • Discipline in meeting deadlines and managing workload efficiently.
  • Strong commitment to:
    • Confidentiality of manuscript content.
    • Objectivity in evaluation.

Reasons to use Rodeo

I’m in my final year doing Economics and I don’t know whether to apply for grad schemes now or do a masters first. What do you think?

Honest answer — it depends on where you want to end up. A lot of top grad schemes (Big 4, civil service, banking) don’t need a masters. Let’s look at the ones you’d be competitive for now, and we can decide if a masters actually adds anything.

Also worth knowing: most autumn 2026 applications are open now. Timing matters more than you think.

Start with a chat, not a search bar

Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.

P

Graduate Consultant — 2026 Scheme

PwC·London, UK
£35,000/yr

Why you're a good match

Strong

Your economics background and your summer at a regional bank line up with what PwC looks for on the consulting scheme. Applications close in four weeks.

See breakdown
Save jobNot relevant
View details

It searches the market for you

Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.

Why you're a good match

You’ve got the grades and the economics background, and your bank internship is exactly the experience this scheme looks for. Apply soon — deadlines close within the month.

See breakdown
Strong

Experience fit

Your summer at the bank plus your econometrics coursework map directly to the day-one responsibilities on this scheme — client modelling, market briefings, and deal support.

See breakdown
Strong

Only hits

No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.

Desirable Experience

  • Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals.
  • Familiarity with online manuscript submission/review systems (e.g., ScholarOne, Editorial Manager).

Key Responsibilities

Your role will include:

  • Assessing Novelty

    • Determine if the manuscript presents truly original contributions to the field.
    • Evaluate whether the work’s insights significantly advance knowledge.
  • Evaluating Study Design & Methodology

    • Review the rigour of the research design and methods.
    • Ensure claims are reproducible and methods are appropriate.

Get help with your application

Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.

Get help applying for this job
  • Literature Review Check

    • Verify the manuscript integrates current, relevant research in the field.
    • Confirm citations are up-to-date and comprehensive.
  • Analysing Results & Conclusions

    • Check whether data presentation is clear, accurate, and appropriate.
    • Assess if conclusions are well-supported and justified by the results.
  • Providing Constructive Feedback

    • Identify strengths and weaknesses of the submission.
    • Suggest improvements to enhance clarity or quality.
    • Flag ethical concerns or potential methodological issues.
  • Supporting Editorial Decisions

    • Based on your expert evaluation, the journal editor will decide whether the manuscript is:
      • Accepted as published.
      • Revised with specified corrections.
      • Rejected due to inadequacies.

Trusted by 25,000+ job seekers

“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”

Jessica, London

Get help applying for this job

Skills

Analytical Skills
Critical Thinking
Written Communication
Research Methodologies
Ethical Principles
Peer Review
Time Management
Confidentiality
Objectivity
Study Design
Methodology Evaluation
Literature Review
Results Analysis
Constructive Feedback
Publication Recommendation

Location

United Kingdom

Sign up to applySee more jobs like this