Fengkai Group Co., Limited
PHD Peer Review Need– Operations Research
How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
PHD Peer Review Need– Operations Research
Peer Reviewer (Academic Journals) — Long-Term, Stable (Part-Time, Remote)
This is a long-term, stable part-time role that supports remote work. Please note: This position requires precise and accurate applications—carefully read the recruitment requirements before submitting your form.
About the Role
The ideal candidate will serve as a Peer Reviewer for high-impact academic journals (SCI/SSCI indexed). This is a trusted and structured position, aligned with the journal’s activities and objectives.
Requirements
To be considered, you must meet the following qualifications:
- A Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced academic degree in a relevant discipline
- At least 5 published research papers in SCI/SSCI-indexed journals within the past three years
- Thorough understanding of:
- Research methodologies applicable to the field of study
- Ethical principles governing research integrity
- Excellent analytical and critical thinking abilities, with a strong focus on in-depth assessment
- Outstanding written communication skills, ensuring clear, concise, and constructive feedback
- Strong time management, with the ability to meet deadlines reliably
- Unwavering commitment to confidentiality and objective assessment
- Preferred (but not mandatory): Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals
- Technical familiarity with:
- Online manuscript submission and review systems
- Editorial platforms used in academic publishing
Reasons to use Rodeo
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
It searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
Key Responsibilities
If selected, your role will include:
1. Assessing Manuscript Novelty and Impact
Evaluate whether the submitted manuscript presents original contributions that meaningfully advance knowledge or insights in the field.
2. Reviewing Study Design and Methodology
Scrutinise the study design and methods to ensure:
- Applicability and relevance
- Adequacy for answering the stated research question
- Full transparency in reporting to enable reproducibility
3. Evaluating Literature Reviews
Verify that the manuscript:
- Thoroughly synthesizes relevant literature
- Cites up-to-date, authoritative sources
- Avoids key gaps in knowledge
Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
4. Analysing Data and Conclusions
- Assess clarity, consistency, and statistical validity of results
- Confirm that conclusions are logically derived from the presented data
- Examine wider significance to the disciplinary field
5. Providing Constructive Feedback
- Offer actionable recommendations for strengthening the paper
- Highlight potential biases, gaps, or ethical concerns
- Balance detailed critique with structured advice for revision
6. Informed Recommendations for Publication
While reviewers do not make final decisions, your evaluation informs the editor’s decision on:
- Acceptance, without revision
- Acceptance, with minor/major revisions
- Rejection (with justifications)
Application instructions and further details are available via our official recruitment portal. If your experience aligns with these requirements, we encourage a full application.
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Skills
Location