Fengkai Group Co., Limited
PHD Peer Review Need – Polymer Science
How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
PHD Peer Review Need – Polymer Science
Academic Peer Reviewer – Primary Reviewer Position
About the Role
This is a long-term, stable part-time role supporting remote work. Candidates should carefully review the requirements before applying.
Requirements
To qualify, you must have:
- A Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced degree in the relevant subject area
- Published at least 5 papers in SCI/SSCI journals within the past three years
- A thorough understanding of research methodologies and ethical principles in your discipline
- Excellent analytical and critical thinking skills to evaluate scholarly work
- Strong written communication abilities, providing clear, concise, and constructive feedback
- The ability to adhere to deadlines and manage workload efficiently
- A commitment to confidentiality and objectivity
- Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals is highly desirable
- Familiarity with online manuscript submission and review systems
Reasons to use Rodeo
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
It searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
Responsibilities
Key tasks include:
- Assessing Novelty: Determine whether the manuscript is original and contributes new knowledge or insights to the field.
- Evaluating Study Design & Methodology: Ensure the methodology is appropriate, comprehensive, and clearly described for replication.
- Literature Review Application: Verify the manuscript adequately references current and relevant research.
- Analysing Results & Conclusions: Assess whether findings are presented logically and conclusions are supported by evidence, with field significance.
- Providing Constructive Feedback: Flag improvements, flaws, omissions, or ethical issues while maintaining professionalism.
- Recommendation for Publication: (Based on review) only the editorial team makes final decisions on accept/revise/reject status, though reviews substantially inform these choices.
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Skills
Location