Fengkai Group Co., Limited
PHD Peer Review Need– Tourism Management
How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
Peer Reviewer for Academic Journals (Long-term, stable part-time, remote position)
Requirements (Essential Qualifications)
- Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced degree in the relevant discipline
- Publication track record: At least 5 papers published in SCI/SSCI journals within the past three years
- Demonstrable expertise in:
- Research methodologies within the discipline
- Ethical principles of academic research
- Strong analytical and critical thinking skills for rigorous manuscript evaluation
- Excellent written communication with the ability to provide:
- Clear, concise, and constructive feedback
- Well-structured recommendations for improvements
- Ability to:
- Meet deadlines consistently
- Manage time efficiently
- Uphold confidentiality and objecticity
- Preferred but not required:
- Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals
- Familiarity with online manuscript submission and review systems
Reasons to use Rodeo
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
It searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
Core Responsibilities
You will assess the scientific, methodological, and literary merit of manuscripts before publication, following these criteria:
-
Novelty Evaluation:
- Determine if the manuscript presents original contributions to the field
- Assess whether it provides new knowledge or insights
-
Study Design & Methodology Review:
- Verify if the study design and methods are appropriate, comprehensive, and reproducible
- Confirm clear documentation of methodologies for transparency
-
Literature Review Assessment:
- Ensure the manuscript integrates relevant, up-to-date research from the field
- Check for comprehensive citations and rigorous review of prior work
Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
-
Results & Conclusions Analysis:
- Clarity: Are results presented clearly and** transparently**?
- Validity: Do conclusions logically follow from the data?
- Significance: Are the findings meaningful to the academic/funder community?
-
Feedback & Recommendations:
- Highlight flaws, omissions, or ethical concerns
- Provide actionable suggestions for improving the manuscript
- Offer balanced, evidence-based critique
-
Final Recommendation Support:
- Your review will inform the editor’s decision:
- Accept (as-is, or with minor revisions)
- Revise (with significant changes required)
- Reject (no healthy pathway to publication)
- Your review will inform the editor’s decision:
Note: Accuracy and rigor in reviews are paramount. Past publication records and research expertise are critical here.
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Skills
Location