Fengkai Group Co., Limited
PHD Peer Review Need– Zoology
How your CV stacks up
Upload your CV to see how well it fits this job role
?%
Short-Term, Stable Part-Time Role Supporting remote work. Please review the requirements thoroughly before applying.
About the Role
This is a long-term, stable part-time position for an expert academic peer reviewer (remote-friendly).
Requirements
⚠️ Essential Qualifications
To be eligible, candidates must meet all of the following criteria:
- Doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced degree in the relevant subject area.
- Published at least 5 papers in SCI / SSCI journals within/during the past three years.
- Thorough engagement with research methodologies and adherence to ethical principles in the discipline.
- Strong analytical and critical thinking skills for in-depth assessments.
- Excellent written communication, ensuring feedback is clear, concise, and constructive.
- Reliable time management with a track record of meeting deadlines.
- Unwavering commitment to confidentiality and objectivity.
Reasons to use Rodeo
Start with a chat, not a search bar
Grad scheme, placement, apprenticeship? Not sure what you want yet — that's fine. Your agent talks it through with you and turns "I have no idea" into a shortlist.
It searches the market for you
Every day your agent scans the market matching roles against what actually matters to you, not just keywords on a CV.
Only hits
No noise. No "maybe this fits." Just roles with a clear explanation of why they're right — and where to focus when applying.
🔹 Highly Desirable
- Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals.
- Familiarity with online manuscript submission and review systems (e.g., ScholarOne, Editorial Manager, etc.).
Get help with your application
Your very own career expert that helps elevate your application to the next level.
Responsibilities
Your core duties include:
- Assessing Novelty: Judge whether the manuscript presents original knowledge or insights to the field.
- Evaluating Study Design and Methodology:
- Review if the study’s design and methods are well-suited, thorough, and clearly documented.
- Ensure reproducibility is feasible with available details.
- Checking Literature Review:
- Verify that the manuscript critically incorporates and properly cites relevant, up-to-date research.
- Analyzing Results and Conclusions:
- Confirm results are clear, logically presented, and appropriately interpreted.
- Assess whether conclusions align with data and hold significance to the field.
- Providing Constructive Feedback:
- Highlight strengths and offer actionable suggestions for improvement.
- Identify gaps, weaknesses, or ethical concerns for the author’s consideration.
- Supporting Editorial Decisions:
- Forward your review to the journal editor, who will make a final recommendation (acceptance, revision, or rejection) based on your evaluation.
“It took my CV and asked me questions relevant to understanding what kind of jobs to suggest for me. Suggestions were almost perfect. Jobs were exactly what I’ve been looking for.”
Jessica, London
Skills
Location